WARNING: line length of 90 exceeds 80 columns
#43: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c:2217:
+ * N*2^32                   (N+1)*2^32                (N+2)*2^32                (N+3)*2^32

WARNING: line length of 83 exceeds 80 columns
#44: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c:2218:
+ * ||----|=====|--|----------||----|=====|-------------||--|-|=====|-------------||

WARNING: Avoid line continuations in quoted strings
#60: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c:2234:
+	asm volatile ("							\

WARNING: Avoid line continuations in quoted strings
#92: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c:2266:
+	asm volatile ("						\

WARNING: line length of 90 exceeds 80 columns
#113: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c:2287:
+ * Similar to the deduce64_from_32_block_change test, with conservative signed boundaries.

WARNING: Avoid line continuations in quoted strings
#125: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c:2299:
+	asm volatile ("						\

WARNING: line length of 90 exceeds 80 columns
#148: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c:2322:
+ * N*2^32                   (N+1)*2^32                (N+2)*2^32                (N+3)*2^32

WARNING: line length of 83 exceeds 80 columns
#149: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c:2323:
+ * ||===|---------|------|===||===|----------------|===||===|---------|------|===||

WARNING: line length of 82 exceeds 80 columns
#150: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c:2324:
+ *  |b >|         |      |< b||b >|                |< b||b >|         |      |< b|

WARNING: Avoid line continuations in quoted strings
#165: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c:2339:
+	asm volatile ("							\

WARNING: Avoid line continuations in quoted strings
#197: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c:2371:
+	asm volatile ("							\

WARNING: line length of 89 exceeds 80 columns
#202: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c:2376:
+	if r0 > r1 goto 2f;	/* u64: [0x7FFFFFFF'00000001, 0x80000002'00000010] */	\

total: 0 errors, 12 warnings, 0 checks, 181 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

Commit ac53a458e346 ("selftests/bpf: new cases handled by 32->64 range refinements") has style problems, please review.

NOTE: Ignored message types: ALLOC_SIZEOF_STRUCT BAD_REPORTED_BY_LINK CAMELCASE COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE FILE_PATH_CHANGES GIT_COMMIT_ID MACRO_ARG_REUSE NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
total: 0 errors, 12 warnings, 0 checks, 181 lines checked