Documentation/.renames.txt: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:101:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:101:39: expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:101:39: got struct rqspinlock_held * ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:122:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:122:39: expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:122:39: got struct rqspinlock_held * ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:135:51: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:135:51: expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:135:51: got struct rqspinlock_held * ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:689:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:689:39: expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:689:39: got struct rqspinlock_held * ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:708:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_lock' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:724:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_unlock' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:730:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:749:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore' was not declared. Should it be static? WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: lookup_object_or_alloc+0x462 (section: .text) -> is_static_object (section: .init.text) ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static? Documentation/.renames.txt: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:101:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:101:39: expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:101:39: got struct rqspinlock_held * ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:122:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:122:39: expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:122:39: got struct rqspinlock_held * ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:135:51: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:135:51: expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:135:51: got struct rqspinlock_held * ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:695:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:695:39: expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:695:39: got struct rqspinlock_held * ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:714:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_lock' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:730:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_unlock' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:736:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:755:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore' was not declared. Should it be static? WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: lookup_object_or_alloc+0x462 (section: .text) -> is_static_object (section: .init.text) ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static?