pylint 3.3.9
astroid 3.3.8
Python 3.14.2 (main, Dec  5 2025, 00:00:00) [GCC 15.2.1 20251111 (Red Hat 15.2.1-4)]
Redirect to /tmp/tmp.Qa0mfIPztO and /tmp/tmp.VBD0FkinPk
Tree base:
0b71c0fd4686 ("tools: ynl: fix pylint misc warnings")
Now at:
f423949236d0 ("tools: ynl: fix pylint global variable related warnings")
 ====== Checking before the patch ======
************* Module pyynl.lib.nlspec
tools/net/ynl/pyynl/lib/nlspec.py:17:0: C0103: Constant name "jsonschema" doesn't conform to UPPER_CASE naming style (invalid-name)
tools/net/ynl/pyynl/lib/nlspec.py:302:15: E1101: Instance of 'list' has no 'items' member (no-member)
tools/net/ynl/pyynl/lib/nlspec.py:466:12: W0603: Using the global statement (global-statement)
tools/net/ynl/pyynl/lib/nlspec.py:579:22: E0606: Possibly using variable 'op' before assignment (possibly-used-before-assignment)

------------------------------------------------------------------
Your code has been rated at 9.64/10 (previous run: 9.64/10, +0.00)

************* Module pyynl.lib.ynl
tools/net/ynl/pyynl/lib/ynl.py:323:0: C0103: Constant name "genl_family_name_to_id" doesn't conform to UPPER_CASE naming style (invalid-name)
tools/net/ynl/pyynl/lib/ynl.py:351:8: W0603: Using the global statement (global-statement)
tools/net/ynl/pyynl/lib/ynl.py:352:33: R1735: Consider using '{}' instead of a call to 'dict'. (use-dict-literal)
tools/net/ynl/pyynl/lib/ynl.py:445:8: W0602: Using global for 'genl_family_name_to_id' but no assignment is done (global-variable-not-assigned)

------------------------------------------------------------------
Your code has been rated at 9.96/10 (previous run: 9.96/10, +0.00)

 ====== Checking the tree with the patch ======
************* Module pyynl.lib.nlspec
tools/net/ynl/pyynl/lib/nlspec.py:298:15: E1101: Instance of 'list' has no 'items' member (no-member)
tools/net/ynl/pyynl/lib/nlspec.py:577:22: E0606: Possibly using variable 'op' before assignment (possibly-used-before-assignment)

------------------------------------------------------------------
Your code has been rated at 9.70/10 (previous run: 9.64/10, +0.06)


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Your code has been rated at 10.00/10 (previous run: 9.96/10, +0.04)